MJRC · Flagship Research Programme
Media Influence Matrix
Mapping the power behind journalism.
Created by Marius Dragomir in 2017, the Media Influence Matrix examines how regulation, ownership, funding and technology shape journalism and public information.
Understanding Information Power
The News Is Shaped Before It Reaches Us.
Journalism operates within a web of political decisions, financial relationships and technological systems. Regulators can open or restrict markets. Owners and funders can sustain newsrooms or constrain their independence. Platforms and infrastructure providers can influence what audiences discover and how journalism earns revenue.
MIM connects these relationships through a common research framework. Its country studies examine influential news media and the actors around them, combining local knowledge with comparative analysis to make the structures of influence visible.
The project began with country reports and has developed an expanded methodology for an information environment increasingly shaped by platforms, data and AI.
The Research Framework
Follow the Rules. Follow the Money. Follow the Technology.
MIM studies how these forms of power interact, and what their relationships mean for independent journalism and the public’s access to information.
Political Power
Regulation and Policy
Who sets the rules, who influences regulators, and how do policy decisions affect journalism?
- Regulators and policy decision-makers
- Appointments, funding and institutional independence
- Industry, civil society and external influence
- Transparency and the effects of regulatory decisions
Economic Power
Ownership and Funding
Who controls media and pays for journalism, and how does financial dependence shape editorial freedom?
- Owners, investors and corporate relationships
- Advertisers, philanthropy and other private funders
- Public funding and state advertising
- Revenue models, audiences and economic dependence
Technological Power
Technology and Infrastructure
Who controls information’s production, visibility and distribution, and how do technology firms engage with governments and newsrooms?
- Platforms, telecommunications and AI companies
- Algorithms, data and distribution systems
- Infrastructure and access to audiences
- Commercial relationships and government connections
Explore the Published Research
Country Research
Explore national media systems through the country studies, profiles and related evidence available on the project site.
Browse Countries (opens in a new tab)Report Archive
Read MIM’s published reports on government and regulation, journalism funding, and technology.
Open the Report Archive (opens in a new tab)Current Methodology
Explore the expanded framework for mapping political, economic and technological influence across the information environment.
Explore the Methodology (opens in a new tab)Published country reports form the project’s historical research record. The revised methodology guides the next generation of MIM country research; those earlier reports retain their original methodological basis.
The Case for MIM
Independence Depends on the System Around Journalism.
Threats to journalism include censorship, harassment and direct attacks. They also arise through less visible relationships: concentrated ownership, selective funding, political influence over regulators and dependence on the companies that distribute information.
Understanding these relationships helps researchers, journalists, civil society and policymakers identify where influence is exercised and where reform can make a difference. Country knowledge and a shared framework make it possible to compare experiences without losing the context that explains them.
Beyond Besieged: Understanding the Media’s Ills, and Finding CuresA founding perspective by Nicholas Benequista · 2017
In his essay on the case for this research, Nicholas Benequista argued that protecting journalism requires understanding the conditions in which it operates. Laws, commercial interests and technological arrangements help determine whose voices are heard and which forms of journalism can survive.
His discussion of Tunisia’s post-2011 transition illustrated the limits of formal reform when established media owners, contested regulation and control over communications infrastructure continue to shape the public sphere. It was an argument for studying the relationships behind visible events and individual attacks.
Benequista highlighted the value of research in under-studied countries, a framework connecting government, funding and technology, and publicly accessible findings that allow comparison and learning across borders. These ideas remain central to MIM’s purpose: building evidence that can inform efforts to strengthen independent journalism.
Read Nicholas Benequista’s Original Essay (opens in a new tab)How the Research Is Built
A Shared Framework, Designed to Evolve.
MIM combines country expertise with a common set of research questions. Its original template established the basis for comparative reports; the current methodology extends that work to connected datasets and a broader range of information actors.
Current Framework · 2025+
From Country Reports to Connected Data
The revised framework is designed for comparable data on institutions, companies, owners, funding flows and technological dependencies. It expands the research to platforms, AI companies, cloud providers and other infrastructure shaping public information.
The current methodology and collection tools are available on the dedicated project site. The original reports remain accessible through the archive.
The Original Research TemplateThe foundation of MIM’s comparative country reports
The original template organized research around government and regulation, funding, and technology. Country teams used shared questions to collect evidence, profile influential actors and explain how local media systems worked. The downloadable guidelines were updated in March 2020.
Government, Politics and Regulation
- Review the legal environment and its effects on journalism.
- Profile broadcasting, spectrum, press, internet, data protection and other relevant regulators.
- Examine mandates, board composition, appointments and funding.
- Identify decision-makers, transparency practices and significant decisions.
- Map local and external actors influencing the regulatory process.
Funding
- Examine news consumption and the most popular and influential media.
- Trace changes in journalism’s business and funding models.
- Identify advertisers, philanthropies and other non-government funders.
- Map government support, including public media allocations, state advertising and subsidies.
- Assess the relationships between funding and editorial coverage.
Technology, Public Sphere and Journalism
- Describe the technological environment for news production and distribution.
- Profile key companies, their ownership and local operations.
- Examine relationships with governments and regulatory authorities.
- Study distribution agreements, automation and monetization.
- Trace connections between technology companies and news media.
The People Behind the Project
An International Research Network
Country researchers, specialists and research assistants have helped build MIM across successive studies. Explore the contributors and areas of expertise behind that work.
Project Founder
Marius Dragomir
The Director of the Media and Journalism Research Center created MIM in 2017, bringing together research on policy, funding and technology within a common framework for understanding media influence.
Open a country to see the people who have contributed to its research.
Argentina
Guillermo Mastrini
Media ownership, cultural industries and communication policy.
Carla Belén Repetto
Broadcasting business models and communication industries.
Martín Razzeto
Pay television businesses and content production.
Brazil
Guillermo Mastrini
Media ownership, cultural industries and communication policy.
Rafael Paes Henriques
Philosophy, communication, journalism and territorialities.
Gabriela Maia Peterle Reis
Gender, source selection and intersectionality in journalism.
Igor Miranda Dadalto
Journalism research contributor.
Larissa Cors
Journalism research contributor.
Letícia Tononi Fortaleza
Journalism research contributor.
Matheus Aldyr Moraes
Journalism research contributor.
Bulgaria
Mariia Altergot
Public policy, media regulation and internet policy.
Colombia
Gabriel Ernesto Levy Bravo
Telecommunications, digital communication and digital transformation.
María Cecilia Hernández Ocampo
Digital communication, audience research and communication strategy.
María Paula Ángel Benavides
Communication research, media and higher education.
Czech Republic
Marius Dragomir
Project founder; media policy, ownership and funding.
Georgia
Giorgi Jangiani
Disinformation, digital policy and media business.
Ekaterine Basilaia
Media research, policy advocacy and democratic governance.
Levani Tevdoradze
Research contributor.
India
Vibodh Parthasarathi
Media policy, political economy and creative industries.
Simran Agarwal
Media governance, policy and political economy.
Manisha Venkat
Advertising, creative industries and developing media economies.
Kripa Fernandes
Research assistant.
Prem Sylvester
Research assistant.
Shivani Chunekar
Research assistant.
Shubhangi Heda
Research assistant.
Tushita Shekhar
Research assistant.
Indonesia
Nurma Fitrianingrum
Public policy, media and social media governance.
Lisette Reuvers
Public policy, inequality and journalism.
Israel
Roni Dorot
Political communication, Israeli media and documentary analysis.
Italy
Matteo Trevisan
Media freedom, freedom of expression and European policy.
Jordan
Ian Graham
Media regulation and philanthropic support for journalism.
Kazakhstan
Adil Nussipov
Digital policy, government–media relations and global governance.
Kyrgyzstan
Gulnura Toralieva
Media development, communication and open government.
Mexico
Rodrigo Gómez
Media systems, communication policy and media business.
Juan S. Larrosa-Fuentes
Public and political communication.
Argelia Muñoz Larroa
Cultural industries, sustainability and public policy.
Gabriel Sosa Plata
Public media, communication policy and accountability.
Pakistan
Ifra Asad
Public policy, civil society and minority rights.
Mackenzie Nelson
Public discourse, online intermediaries and platform governance.
Romania
Dumitrița Holdiș
Media representation, migration, labor and audio research.
Russia
Leonardo Ingannamorte
Law, human rights and international relations.
Olesya Shmagun
Investigative journalism and corruption reporting.
Slovakia
Marius Dragomir
Project founder; media policy, ownership and funding.
Spain
Francisco Campos-Freire
Media enterprises and public service media.
Marta Rodríguez-Castro
Public media, digital services and platform regulation.
Ana Isabel Rodríguez-Vázquez
Media audiences, innovation and audiovisual communication.
Alejandro Gesto-Louro
Public media funding and technological change.
Óscar Juanatey-Boga
Media marketing, communication strategies and funding.
Valentín Alejandro Martínez-Fernández
Media management and the transformation of print.
Marius Dragomir
Project founder; media policy, ownership and funding.
Norina Solomon
Editing, translation and research assistance.
Ukraine
Olesya Grabova
Political economy, public opinion and Eastern Europe.
Anastasiia Tarasova
Public affairs, international law and human rights.
United Kingdom
Leo Watkins
Media ownership, media reform, technology and telecommunications.
Yemen
Abdullah Qaid
Journalism on conflict, human rights and corruption.
No matching country or contributor. Try another name or clear the search.
Continue Exploring
Explore Media Influence Matrix
Visit the project’s updated website for country research, published reports and the methodology guiding its next generation of work.
Invest in independent media research and join a community of practice.
MJRC takes no government money — so the questions we chase are set by the field, not by a funder. A contribution keeps our research and global analysis independent, and buys you a seat closer to the work: early access to new findings, invitations to small-group briefings, a place in our Supporters Circle, and the option to be listed on our Supporters Page.

