Citation Station

Evidence submitted to the Culture, Media and Sport Committee draws on MJRC’s comparative research into media capture.

The submission is by the British Broadcasting Challenge. Hosting by Parliament does not make it a parliamentary finding or endorsement.

Marko Milosavljević and Melita Poler use MJRC’s classification framework to examine public accountability and state ownership.

Martin Moore cites MJRC’s research in an examination of threats to independent public service media.

The commissioned study cites research on state-media independence, media capture, and public funding.

The original landing-page link has been replaced with its full report PDF.

Julia Sonnevend and Veronika Kövesdi cite research on media funding and state-media independence.

The reference list is public; access to the full article may depend on a subscription.

A policy brief draws on Dragomir’s analysis of media capture and the relationship between governments and media owners.

The report applies a four-part conception of media capture developed by Dragomir.

The source also acknowledges a direct advisory contribution.

The report uses the CMDS framework to explain four mechanisms of media capture in Europe.

Earlier research associated with CEU’s Center for Media, Data and Society (CMDS).

An open data repository builds on State Media Monitor’s seed data and classification methodology.

The original German Marshall Fund GitHub URL now redirects to the Institute for Strategic Dialogue repository.

Romanian-language coverage of the 2025 monitor describes the decline in independent public media and regional differences.

Coverage of MJRC’s research on the financing of journalism in Mexico.

An investigation quotes Dragomir on media concentration and the limits of proposed European safeguards.

Title updated to match the publisher. Full access may require a subscription.

The article uses State Media Monitor findings in a discussion of broadcasters and political incumbency.

Newsweek draws on MJRC expertise when examining Twitter’s labeling of NPR.

Coverage includes MJRC’s perspective on international state-media networks.

The report quotes MJRC’s director on Chinese state-media outreach in India.

Coverage of a Greek parliamentary intervention refers to the state-media study and its assessment of Greece.

Turkish-language coverage explains the 2022 state-media report and its findings for Turkey.

Hungarian-language reporting covers the deterioration in public-media independence identified by the study.

Coverage applies the state-media study’s findings to Malta’s public broadcaster.

The conference programme lists Dragomir’s keynote on global trends in journalism and democracy.

A podcast discussion with Dragomir on the pressures facing independent media in the region.

A roundtable discussion examines the position of public media internationally.

A recorded conversation on freedom of expression in Central and Eastern Europe.

PMA shares the latest global findings from MJRC’s 2025 study with its public-media network.

IPI presents the joint overview report assessing media capture and implementation of the European Media Freedom Act.

The academic programme features two MJRC reports produced by its students.

A study by Andrei Richter published within a media-reform project involving MJRC.

Attila Mong’s study forms part of the media-reform project delivered with MJRC.

A journal article co-authored by Marius Dragomir, José Rúas-Araújo, and Minna Horowitz.

CIPE shares research led by MJRC’s director on private-sector support for independent journalism.

PMA presents findings from MJRC’s 2023 assessment of state and public media.

The dashboard draws on MJRC’s media-plurality analysis and audience estimates.

Title corrected from the older filename to the PDF’s cover title. The verified copy is hosted on MJRC’s website.

The policy brief incorporates Dragomir’s taxonomy of journalism funding mechanisms.

CIMA publishes research led by Dragomir on the business community’s support for independent journalism.

The institutional report records the work of CMDS and the launch of State Media Monitor.

PMA’s research directory introduces the database and explains the dimensions used to assess state media.

The resource centre summarizes the study’s assessment of editorial independence around the world.

A book chapter co-authored by Ana-Isabel Rodríguez-Vázquez, Marius Dragomir, and Noelia Francisco-Lens.

Full chapter access may require a subscription or purchase.

A research resource presents the Italian Media Influence Matrix report.

UNESCO publishes Dragomir’s study of media capture and threats to editorial independence.

Replaces a mismatched link that previously led to the IPI Czech Republic report.

PMA’s research directory introduces the country-level research project.

A research round-up discusses the connection between funding models and editorial independence.

GFMD’s resource collection includes the state-media study and the monitoring database.

An opinion article by Dragomir on media capture in Hungary and European safeguards.

Commentary by Dragomir on European responses to concentrated media power.

Commentary by Dragomir on platform labels and the independence of public media.

Dragomir discusses pressure on public media and the distinction between public service and state control.

An opinion article by Dragomir in defence of independent public media.

Dragomir writes about the public value of editorially independent broadcasters.

Dragomir examines pressure on public broadcasters, including in Western Europe.

Commentary by Dragomir on public-service broadcasting and the labels used by Twitter.

Dragomir explains why state control and independent public service are different models.

A republication of Dragomir’s commentary on threats to public media.

Dragomir discusses the democratic importance of independent public media.