An MJRC research project

StateMediaMonitor.

Understanding who funds, governs and shapes state and public media.

Global research on editorial independence, government influence and the conditions that enable media to serve the public.

Explore the dedicated project website

About the project

Follow the evidence behind editorial independence.

State Media Monitor is a project of the Media and Journalism Research Center (MJRC). It examines how state and public media are financed, who controls their ownership and governing bodies, and how freely their journalists can make editorial decisions.

The research uses the State Media Matrix to distinguish between different forms of state control, media capture and editorial autonomy. Examining these relationships together provides a fuller understanding of each outlet’s independence and the pressures it faces.

The project draws on the State Media Database, whose collection began in 2004 under Marius Dragomir. Its evidence base has developed through international research including Television Across Europe, Mapping Digital Media and the Media Influence Matrix, supported by specialist researchers and partner organisations.

The findings support journalists, researchers, policymakers and media organisations seeking to understand government influence and strengthen independent public-interest media.

The analytical framework

The State Media Matrix

Funding, ownership and editorial practice can pull in different directions. The Matrix examines each of these dimensions to understand how a media outlet operates and where government influence enters the picture.

Funding

Who pays?

Where revenue comes from, the role of state subsidies and advertising, and how financial arrangements affect the outlet’s independence.

Ownership & governance

Who appoints?

Who owns the organisation, appoints its leadership and supervisory bodies, and exercises influence over its management.

Editorial autonomy

Who decides?

Whether journalists can choose and report stories independently, and whether protections against interference work in practice.

Open a model below to see how these dimensions combine. Some state-funded or state-managed outlets retain editorial autonomy; private ownership can also coexist with government control of coverage.

Controlled or captured

SCState-controlled media

State authorities control financing, governing structures and the editorial agenda. News coverage follows a line imposed or approved by those authorities.

Funding
Dependent on state funding
Ownership / governance
Controlled by the state
Editorial decisions
Controlled by the state

CaPuCaptured public or state-managed media

The state controls ownership or governance and influences editorial coverage, while the outlet is not predominantly financed through direct state funding.

Funding
Not predominantly state-funded
Ownership / governance
Controlled by the state
Editorial decisions
Controlled by the state

CaPrCaptured private media

Private ownership coexists with persistent editorial control by state-linked actors. Capture can operate through affiliated businesses, financial relationships or other intermediaries.

Funding
May include state financial support
Ownership / governance
No formal state ownership or state-appointed board
Editorial decisions
Controlled by state-linked actors

Editorially independent

ISFMIndependent state-funded and state-managed media

The state provides most funding and owns or governs the outlet. Effective safeguards or practices nevertheless preserve the newsroom’s freedom to make editorial decisions.

Funding
Predominantly state-funded
Ownership / governance
Owned or governed by the state
Editorial decisions
Editorially autonomous

ISFIndependent state-funded media

State financing is the main source of income, while governing bodies and the newsroom operate independently of government influence.

Funding
Predominantly state-funded
Ownership / governance
Independent of government influence
Editorial decisions
Editorially autonomous

ISMIndependent state-managed media

The outlet is state-owned or governed, but is not predominantly dependent on state financing and retains editorial autonomy.

Funding
Not predominantly state-funded
Ownership / governance
Owned or governed by the state
Editorial decisions
Editorially autonomous

IPIndependent public media

Public-interest media whose funding and governance arrangements protect them from government interference, supported by effective editorial safeguards and accountability mechanisms.

Funding
Designed to protect independence
Ownership / governance
Protected from government interference
Editorial decisions
Editorially autonomous

How the research works

Evidence behind every classification.

The methodology brings together financial records, governance arrangements and evidence of editorial practice. Researchers analyse this material against the State Media Matrix, with ongoing regional monitoring informing updates.

Read the full methodology (opens in a new tab)

Funding and governance evidence

Researchers establish where an outlet’s money comes from and how its ownership, appointments and management work. Sources are organised into tiers:

Official records
Annual reports and legal acts establishing funding and governance arrangements.
Published reporting and research
Media coverage, NGO reports and academic studies.
Interviews and investigations
Expert knowledge, sources within media organisations and investigative reporting.

Assessing editorial control

Evidence includes the outlet’s legal mission and statutes, official statements, published research, reporting and interviews. Content analysis is used in selected contexts.

Researchers examine whether editorial safeguards are effective in practice, including oversight and accountability arrangements. Formal guarantees are assessed alongside evidence of actual interference or autonomy.

What counts as a media outlet?

The unit of analysis is the media operator or organisation. An operator may provide television, radio, print and online services through multiple channels and brands.

Separate operators are treated as distinct entities. Where a single government body runs several services, they are generally counted together. Relevant ownership portfolios and acquisitions are explained in the analysis.

Monitoring change over time

The database is maintained through continuing research and regional updates. Political, financial or organisational changes can alter an outlet’s classification between study editions.

These changes cannot always be captured immediately. Read a profile’s update information and supporting sources when using a classification, and use the dedicated project website for the most recent available research.

Publications & findings

A global record of change.

Explore the annual research on state and public media, from the introduction of the Matrix to subsequent studies of editorial independence, government influence and media capture.

2025Global study · PDF

Independence Under Siege

The State Media Monitor 2025 Global Study

An examination of the pressures on editorial independence in state and public media, tracing changes in government control, the growth of captured media and the fragility of safeguards across regions.

2023Global study · PDF

From Puppet to Powerhouse

A Global Study of the Independence of State and Public Media

A global assessment of editorial autonomy, examining government control, media capture and the conditions that allow public-interest journalism to remain independent.

2022Global study · PDF

The State of State Media

A Global Analysis of the Editorial Independence of State Media Based on the State Media Matrix (2022 edition)

The follow-up global study applies the Matrix to examine changes in editorial independence and the different forms of state control and capture.

2021Global study · PDF

The State of State Media

A Global Analysis of the Editorial Independence of State Media and an Introduction of a New State Media Typology

The founding study introduces the State Media Matrix and its approach to assessing state and public media through funding, governance and editorial autonomy.